After all these years, do you really think it's going to release as an incredible game? Like why do you seriously think they are STILL making Skull and Bones. When you spend over a year or two making a game and it gets to a point to be play tested and it sucks because it isn't fun, and you have to restart to square one and remake the same product in half the time, that's what causes projects to fall apart. And none of it have to do with their programmers not knowing how to maximize the hardware.

I have family that work at Ubisoft, and I know PRECISELY why shit falls apart. The scope and size of games are massive, and the amount of time and money required to release a polished product up to gamers expectations of what 'AAA' is, is pure insanity and it's largely unsustainable. If you're not aware of the challenges and difficulties or know someone who is actively under pressure to deliver AAA, I don't think you should really be speaking on this. I mean seriously, don't talk about how you know about making games if you've never made one, or been part of a development team. It's when people start expecting more from games than just solid game design, do many games start falling apart. Our best and most coveted titles of the last 10 years have largely been indie, because that's where great game design sits.

Good game design seldom has little care about software or hardware technical knowledge, nor does it have to work together. Click to expand.No it's not, I disagree firmly on this.Ī good video game has great game design and everything is secondary to that.

Elder scrolls 6 redfall skullz